Tim Lee

Innovation under Attack

Publishers have sued to stop Google Print, a search engine for books, on the theory that it’s an infringement of copyright to make digital copies of copyrighted books, even if they never show those copies in their entirety to anyone.

The publishers’ position is anti-innovation in a very fundamental way. In the analog world, there’s a clear distinction between “using” a copyrighted work (say, reading a book) and “copying” it (say, using a photocopier). Copyright law says that you’re allowed to use a book you legally own, but generally speaking, you can’t make copies, at least not in a commercial product.

But the “physics” of the digital world are different. Every “use” of content involves the creation of a copy of that data. When you read this web page, dozens of copies of the document were created as it was passed across the Internet. If making a digital copy is a copyright infringement, that means that no one can use their copyrighted content on digital systems without the explicit permission of the copyright owner.

Fortunately, that’s not how the courts have ruled in the past. In 1984, the Supreme Court held that it was a fair use to make personal copies of TV shows for the purpose of “time shifting.” In the 1999 Diamond decision, the Ninth Circuit held that “space shifting”–making copies of music for listening on an MP3 player is a fair use. And in 2002, the Ninth Circuit held that displaying thumbnails of copyrighted images is a fair use. In each case, the court appreciated that new technological realities made the copying involved in these uses fundamentally different than the copying prohibited by traditional copyright law.

Unfortunately, judges have not always been so clear-sighted. In the 2000 MP3.com case, a stubbornly literalist district judge held that storing copies of CDs on MP3.com’s servers for future transmission to customers (all of whom had shown they were legal owners of the CDs) was not a fair use. Unfortunately, that case was settled before it could be appealed.

The courts need to clearly say that the mere act of making a digital copy is not a violation of copyright. What matters is how those copies are used. Fortunately, I think the folks at Google understand what’s at stake, and they know that the future of their business may depend on this issue. They are in the business of organizing the world’s information, most of which is owned by other people. If they have to get permission from each individual copyright holder, many of the innovative things they’d like to do with that information will become logistically impossible. So I’m crossing my fingers and hoping that Larry and Sergei fight this thing all the way to the Supreme Court.

September 22, 2005 | Comments |

3 comments posted

  1. Posted by: Anerot - 12/16/2005

    Tim, I would add the newest brilliant example to your collection:

    Since Bill Gates invented his Word processor, the world prefers not to know that there may be other, principially new concepts for most widespread software which ever existed, — text Editor!
    The one that combines interests of Copyright owner AND the readers who want to EDIT the content exclusively for their own private usage! First ever, the original copyrighted content is safely protected, it never changes, AND readers are capable to create their own versions of it on the screen! The concept is doing perfectly well on the verge of the Copyright Law, and its name is
    http://www.TuneText.com .

    (Yet as extra insurance, its license wisely demands an explicit author’s consent:
    http://www.TuneText.com/license.html ).

  2. Posted by: lara croft topless - 01/12/2007

    ed4d6dd518ec My homepage http://topless.da.cx lara croft topless
    http://videoo.da.cx female orgasm video
    http://freepussy.da.cx free pussy video
    http://boobies.da.cx boobies
    http://sapphicerotica.da.cx sapphic erotica hot
    http://youngboys.da.cx gay very young boys
    http://hotmodels.da.cx nude hot models
    http://redhead.da.cx redhead pussy
    http://gloryhole.da.cx glory hole men
    http://nextdoornikki.da.cx next door nikki new

  3. Posted by: tramadol - 01/21/2007

    81e31de21f46 Nice site http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/baxqorav tramadol

Subscribe to this entry's comments

Comments are closed for this entry.